This uses the new TreeCursor type from the parent commit to reimplement
the tree-sitter motions (`A-p/o/i/n`). Other tree-sitter related
features like textobjects are not touched with this change and will
need a different, unrelated approach to solve.
Test Document
-------------
```
{{
}
}
```
Steps To Reproduce
------------------
1. 2j # move_visual_line_down
1. C # copy_selection_on_next_line
1. mdm # surround_delete
Debug
-----
`assertion failed: last <= from', transaction.rs:597:13`
Release
-------
`called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Char range out of bounds:
char range 18446744073709551614..18446744073709551615,
Rope/RopeSlice char length 7', ropey-1.6.1/src/rope.rs:546:37`
Description
-----------
Processing the surrounding pairs in order violates the assertion the
ranges are ordered. To handle nested surrounds all positions have to
be sorted. Also surround_replace has to track the proper replacement
character for each position.
1. Create a document containing `{A}`
1. C-w v # vsplit
1. gl # goto_line_end
1. b # move_prev_word_start
1. ` # switch_to_lowercase
1. mrm( # surround replace
1. C-w v # vsplit
In the debug build surround_replace/delete will immedately assert with
`assertion failed: last <= from', transaction.rs:597:13`. The splits and
lowercase conversion are not needed to trigger the bug.
In the release build the surround becomes `)a(` and the last vsplit
causes the transaction to panic.
`internal error: entered unreachable code:
(Some(Retain(18446744073709551573)))', transaction.rs:185:46`
Since the selection direction is backwards get_surround_pos returns the
pairs reversed but the downstream code assumes they are in the forward
direction.
* Make `m` textobject look for pairs enclosing selections
Right now, this textobject only looks for pairs that surround the
cursor. This ensures that the pair found encloses each selection, which
is likely to be intuitively what is expected of this textobject.
* Simplification of match code
Co-authored-by: Michael Davis <mcarsondavis@gmail.com>
* Adjust logic for ensuring surround range encloses selection
Prior, it was missing the case where the start of the selection came
before the opening brace. We also had an off-by-one error where if the
end of the selection was on the closing brace it would not work.
* Refactor to search for the open pair specifically to avoid edge cases
* Adjust wording of autoinfo to reflect new functionality
* Implement tests for surround functionality in new integration style
* Fix handling of skip values
* Fix out of bounds error
* Add `ma` version of tests
* Fix formatting of tests
* Reduce indentation levels for readability, and update comments
* Preserve each selection's direction with enclosing pair surround
* Add test case for multiple cursors resulting in overlap
* Mark known failures as TODO
* Make tests multi-threaded or they fail
* Cargo fmt
* Fix typos in integration test comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Davis <mcarsondavis@gmail.com>
When force quitting, we need to block on the pending writes to ensure
that write commands succeed before exiting, and also to avoid a crash
when all the views are gone before the auto format call returns from
the LS.
Michael Davis
Mike Trinkala
woojiq
Daniel Sedlak
Skyler Hawthorne
Daniel S Poulin
Graic