# the orange used for functions is too bright, get a darker shade
# the orange used for functions is slightly too bright, get a darker shade
# find a different color for built-in types, currently using aura's default green-sea
# figure out how to get alpha workin'..
# how does this differ from saturation?
# get a dim color for var/let/mut keyword
# get a different shade or color for var/let/mut general keywords?..
# currently using the same purple as operators.. which isn't too bad though, as it keeps a consistent scheme.. and it doesn't conflict with anything either. it's also good as a fallback for 'end', as that sometimes doesn't highlight properly..
# also, when it's bolded, it becomes a different shade of purple, a brighter one, which is exactly what i wanted
# NOTE:
# struct counts as a keyword, not a type, which can be confusing.. maybe there's more keyword properties..??
@ -132,13 +134,17 @@
'property'={fg="green-aqua"}# Regex group names.
# TODO: no clue.. never seen this.. just matching regex strings for now..
'special'={fg="gold",modifiers=["bold"]}# Special symbols e.g `?` in Rust, `...` in Hare.
'attribute'={fg="purple"}# Class attributes, html tag attributes.
'special'={fg="gold",modifiers=["bold"]}# Special symbols e.g `?` in Rust, `...` in Hare, derive macro in rust?.. TODO: it seems to be used for the fuzzy-matching in pickers..
# gold looks incredible for fuzzy-matching
# it's usually squashed between punctuation ()?; pink-hotter works well for this case..
# pink-hotter vs orange-brighter or another color?..
'attribute'={fg="purple",modifiers=["italic"]}# Class attributes, html tag attributes.
# italics makes sense for html tag attributes.. matching tag
'type'={fg="blue-aqua"}# Variable type, like integer or string, including program defined classes, structs etc..
# NOTE: sometimes there's class / end, which looks odd not bolded like other control/end statements
'type.builtin'={fg="green-sea"}# Primitive types of the language (string, int, float).
# dark-blue was just too ugly.. this is still a funky sea green.. TODO: this is still a funky sea green..
# blue-dark was just too ugly.. this is still a funky sea green.. TODO: this is still a funky sea green..
'type.enum.variant'={fg="green-sea"}# A variant of an enum.
# NOTE: i think was pink in aura theme.. but i def didn't like that for the enum values TODO: maybe white is fine
@ -154,7 +160,7 @@
# 'constant.character' = { fg = "blue-aqua"} # Constant of character type.
'keyword'={fg="purple"}# Language reserved keywords. var, void, struct, let, mut, was accent18 TODO: try it
# TODO: could use another color here.. something that doesn't stick out.. snazzy's yellow is too bright (and dim too dim), maybe a purple-dark with less alpha..?
'keyword.control'={fg="purple",modifiers=["bold"]}# Control keywords.
# TODO: could use a cascading shades of purple here, between purple and purple-darker of operator, darkest on the outside, yet it's also nice to have it consistent..
'keyword.control.return'={fg="pink-salmon",modifiers=["italic"]}# 'return' in most languages.
# NOTE: tried red, but it's so ugly!!.. :/ but could use it's own color.. stole noctis's pink-salmon here.. bold is really nice too, more pink-salmony, but it eventually bugged me..; italics makes it feel like it's *pressed* in
# NOTE: tried red-error, but it's so ugly!!.. :/ but could use it's own color.. stole noctis's pink-salmon here.. bold is really nice too, more pink-salmony, but it eventually bugged me..; italics makes it feel like it's *pressed* in
'keyword.control.exception'={fg="pink-salmon",modifiers=["italic"]}# 'raise' in python.
'keyword.directive'={fg="purple",modifiers=["italic"]}# Preprocessor directives (#if, #include in C).
'keyword.function'={fg="purple",modifiers=["bold"]}# The keyword to define a funtion: 'def', 'fun', 'fn'.
'keyword.storage'={fg="purple"}# function and type modifiers/accessors: public/private, internal, readonly, const, etc.; also struct? var?? namespace?.. lots!!
'keyword.storage'={fg="purple"}# function and type modifiers/accessors: public/private, internal, readonly, const, etc.; also struct? var?? namespace?.. lots!! TODO: maybe there's more properties here..
# only makes sense to bold in C#..
# NOTE: struct and var should match type.builtin
@ -227,16 +234,18 @@
'function.builtin'={fg="gold-dim"}
# TODO: TEST: gold-dim and orange-warning TODO: try minimus's yellow-orange
'function.macro'={fg="gold",modifiers=["italic"]}# Like macros in rust.
# italics here makes sense.. as does the magical gold of macros
'function.special'={fg="orange-brighter",modifiers=["italic"]}# Preprocessor in C.
# package, import
'tag'={fg="purple-darker"}# As in <body> for html.
# must be darker then the default text
'tag'={fg="purple-darker",modifiers=["italic"]}# As in <body> for html.
# must be darker then the default text, and attribute
'namespace'={fg="dark-blue",modifiers=["italic"]}# * Namespace keyword in java, C#, etc.
'namespace'={fg="blue-dark"}# * Namespace keyword in java, C#, etc.
# TODO: this nasty dark-blue accurately matches how i feel about namespace syntax..: *barf*..
# TODO: this nasty blue-dark accurately matches how i feel about namespace syntax..: *barf*.. pink-hotter is interesting... really changes things up!.. but i still prefer something similar to blue for logical reasoning
# for a long time i was using italics here, but then discovered it was part of its ugliness! now it's actually tolerable..!
# Markup ==============================
# Colors for markup languages, like Markdown or XML. also affects comments!!
# bold text isn't so easy to read.. but purple bold works pretty well alongside purple-pleasant
# this orange is surprisingly dim! not bad at all, and keeps a consistent two-color theme
# this orange is surprisingly dim! not bad at all, and keeps a consistent two-color theme. though, orange-brighter is far more beautiful, but perhaps too bright..
rathewolf
2 months ago